• Mi Re-Unir
    Búsqueda Avanzada
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Ver ítem 
    •   Inicio
    • RESULTADOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN
    • Artículos Científicos WOS y SCOPUS
    • Ver ítem
    •   Inicio
    • RESULTADOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN
    • Artículos Científicos WOS y SCOPUS
    • Ver ítem

    Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design

    Autor: 
    Aranaz Andrés, Jesús María
    ;
    Aibar Remón, Carlos
    ;
    Gea-Velázquez de Castro, María Teresa
    ;
    Limón Ramírez, Ramón
    ;
    Bolúmar, Francisco
    ;
    Hernández-Aguado, Ildefonso
    ;
    López Fresneña, Nieves
    ;
    Díaz-Agero Pérez, Cristina
    ;
    Terol García, Enrique
    ;
    Michel, Philippe
    ;
    Sousa, Paulo
    ;
    Larizgoitia Jauregui, Itziar
    Fecha: 
    2017
    Palabra clave: 
    Scopus; JCR
    Revista / editorial: 
    BMJ Open
    Tipo de Ítem: 
    Articulo Revista Indexada
    URI: 
    https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/6318
    DOI: 
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546
    Dirección web: 
    http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/10/e016546
    Open Access
    Resumen:
    Background Adverse events (AEs) epidemiology is the first step to improve practice in the healthcare system. Usually, the preferred method used to estimate the magnitude of the problem is the retrospective cohort study design, with retrospective reviews of the medical records. However this data collection involves a sophisticated sampling plan, and a process of intensive review of sometimes very heavy and complex medical records. Cross-sectional survey is also a valid and feasible methodology to study AEs. Objectives The aim of this study is to compare AEs detection using two different methodologies: cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design. Setting Secondary and tertiary hospitals in five countries: Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico and Peru. Participants The IBEAS Study is a cross-sectional survey with a sample size of 11 379 patients. The retrospective cohort study was obtained from a 10% random sample proportional to hospital size from the entire IBEAS Study population. Methods This study compares the 1-day prevalence of the AEs obtained in the IBEAS Study with the incidence obtained through the retrospective cohort study. Results The prevalence of patients with AEs was 10.47% (95% CI 9.90 to 11.03) (1191/11 379), while the cumulative incidence of the retrospective cohort study was 19.76% (95% CI 17.35% to 22.17%) (215/1088). In both studies the highest risk of suffering AEs was seen in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. Comorbid patients and patients with medical devices showed higher risk. Conclusion The retrospective cohort design, although requires more resources, allows to detect more AEs than the cross-sectional design.
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(es)
    • Artículos Científicos WOS y SCOPUS

    Estadísticas de uso

    Año
    2012
    2013
    2014
    2015
    2016
    2017
    2018
    2019
    2020
    2021
    2022
    2023
    2024
    2025
    Vistas
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    59
    193
    84
    40
    63
    69
    114
    51
    Descargas
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0

    Ítems relacionados

    Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.

    • Inappropriate hospital admission as a risk factor for the subsequent development of adverse events: a cross-sectional study 

      San José Saras, Diego; Vicente-Guijarro, Jorge; Sousa, Paulo; Moreno-Nuñez, Paloma; Aranaz Andrés, Jesús María (BMC Medicine, 2023)
      Background: All health overuse implies an unnecessary risk of patients suffering adverse events (AEs). However, this hypothesis has not been corroborated by direct estimates for inappropriate hospital admission (IHA). The ...
    • Influence of ace gene I/D polymorphism on cardiometabolic risk, maximal fat oxidation, cardiorespiratory fitness, diet and physical activity in young adults 

      Montes-De-oca-garcia, Adrián; Perez-Bey, Alejandro; Velazquez-Diaz, Daniel; Corral-Perez, Juán; Opazo-Diaz, Edgardo; Rebollo-Ramos, María; Gómez-Gallego, Felix ; Cuenca-Garcia, Magdalena; Casals, Cristina; Ponce-González, Jesús (International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021)
      There is controversy about the relationship between ACE I/D polymorphism and health. Seventy-four healthy adults (n = 28 women; 22.5 ± 4.2 years) participated in this cross-sectional study aimed at determining the influence ...
    • Influence of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR)-gamma Coactivator (PGC)-1 alpha gene rs8192678 polymorphism by gender on different health-related parameters in healthy young adults 

      Montes-De-oca-garcia, Adrián; Corral-Perez, Juán; Velazquez-Diaz, Daniel; Perez-Bey, Alejandro; Rebollo-Ramos, María; Marin-Galindo, Alberto; Gómez-Gallego, Felix; Calderón, María; Casals, Cristina; Ponce-González, Jesús (Frontiers in Physiology, 2022)
      This study aimed to analyze the influence of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma coactivator (PGC)-1 alpha (PPARGC1A) gene rs8192678 C > T polymorphism on different health-related parameters in male ...

    Mi cuenta

    AccederRegistrar

    ¿necesitas ayuda?

    Manual de UsuarioContacto: reunir@unir.net

    Listar

    todo Re-UnirComunidades y coleccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosPalabras claveTipo documentoTipo de accesoEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosPalabras claveTipo documentoTipo de acceso






    Aviso Legal Política de Privacidad Política de Cookies Cláusulas legales RGPD
    © UNIR - Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
     
    Aviso Legal Política de Privacidad Política de Cookies Cláusulas legales RGPD
    © UNIR - Universidad Internacional de La Rioja