Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCabezas-Clavijo, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorMilanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis
dc.contributor.authorDelgado-Vázquez, Ángel M.
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-17T06:47:07Z
dc.date.available2022-06-17T06:47:07Z
dc.identifier.citation26th International Conference on Science and technology Indicators (STI);es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/13296
dc.description.abstractUsing Sustainability (the journal outside the IS area that publishes the most bibliometric articles) as a case study, this study uses content analysis to determine various parameters relating to the methodological rigour and reproducibility of the papers published in this journal in 2019 and 2020. In particular, analysis has been performed of the samples and time periods used in the analyses, and whether the authors adequately report the search strategy and the data sources used. Results show that 181 of the 204 studies analysed (88.7%) have one or more methodological limitations which hinder or prevent their reproducibility. This shows that there is considerable room for improvement in the methodological quality of the bibliometric papers published in Sustainability.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/bitstream/item/13939/STI_2022_cabezas%20et%20al.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectsustainabilityes_ES
dc.subjectMDPIes_ES
dc.subjectbibliometricses_ES
dc.subjectcontent analysises_ES
dc.subjectmethodological qualityes_ES
dc.titleMethodological shortcomings of bibliometric papers published in the journal Sustainability (2019-2020)es_ES
dc.typeconferenceObjectes_ES
reunir.tag~OPUes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem