Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Fraile, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez-Panchón, Ana I.
dc.contributor.authorQuemada, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez, Noemí
dc.contributor.authorPascual, Marga
dc.contributor.authorBerzosa-Grande, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorSalvador, Raymond
dc.contributor.authorPomarol-Clotet, Edith
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Carrasco, Manuel
dc.date2024
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-14T13:05:56Z
dc.date.available2026-01-14T13:05:56Z
dc.identifier.citationEduardo González-Fraile, Ana I. Domínguez-Panchón, José Ignacio Quemada, Noemí Álvarez, Marga Pascual, Pilar Berzosa-Grande, Raymond Salvador, Edith Pomarol-Clotet & Manuel Martín-Carrasco (2025) Effectiveness of a psychoeducational program for caregivers of persons with acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial (EDUCA-V), Brain Injury, 39:1, 51-62, DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2401014es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0269-9052
dc.identifier.issn1362-301X
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/18729
dc.description.abstractObjective To assess the effectiveness of a psychoeducational intervention program (PIP) compared to standard attention in reducing caregiver burden after the intervention (at 4 months) and at follow-up (at 8 months). Methods A multicenter, evaluator-blind, randomized controlled trial. The experimental group received a PIP intervention consisting of 10 weekly group sessions, while the control group received standard attention. The primary outcome was measured as the change scores from baseline on the caregiver’s burden (ZBI). The secondary outcomes evaluated included caregiver mental health (GHQ-28), anxiety (STAI), and depression (CES-D). Trial registration: ISRCTN16513116. Results The sample comprised 76 informal caregivers (41 allocated in the intervention condition and 35 in the control). The caregiver’s burden (ZBI) did not show significant differences between groups at 4 months or 8 months. There were favorable and significant changes in the caregiver’s mental health (GHQ) and depression (CES-D) at 4 months in the PIP group. There were no significant differences between groups in anxiety during the trial. Conclusions The PIP intervention group reported positive effects on general mental health and depression after the intervention but not at follow-up. We need more studies which interventions follow expert recommendations and can sustain positive results over time.es_ES
dc.language.isoen_USes_ES
dc.publisherBrain Injuryes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries;vol. 39, nº 1
dc.relation.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699052.2024.2401014es_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectacquired brain injuryes_ES
dc.subjectcaregiver burdenes_ES
dc.subjectdepressiones_ES
dc.subjectmental healthes_ES
dc.subjectpsychoeducationes_ES
dc.subjectrandomized controlled triales_ES
dc.subjectEDUCA V triales_ES
dc.titleEffectiveness of a psychoeducational program for caregivers of persons with acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial (EDUCA-V)es_ES
dc.typeArticulo Revista Indexadaes_ES
reunir.tag~OPUes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2401014


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem