Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorKabir, Pervez
dc.contributor.authorPlaza-Diaz, Julio
dc.contributor.authorMercier, Élisabeth
dc.contributor.authorWan, Shen
dc.contributor.authorHegazy, Nada
dc.contributor.authorWong, Chandler
dc.contributor.authorAddo, Felix
dc.contributor.authorRenouf, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorLawal, Opeyemi U.
dc.contributor.authorGoodridge, Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorGraber, Tyson E.
dc.contributor.authorDelatolla, Robert
dc.date2025
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-17T08:26:52Z
dc.date.available2025-10-17T08:26:52Z
dc.identifier.citationKabir MP, Plaza-Diaz J, Mercier É, Wan S, Hegazy N, Wong C, Addo F, Renouf E, Lawal OU, Goodridge L, Graber TE, Delatolla R. Passive sampling for genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater resource recovery facility: Insights for pandemic preparedness. Water Res. 2025 Oct 1;285:124071. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2025.124071. Epub 2025 Jun 22. PMID: 40570499.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1879-2448
dc.identifier.issn0043-1354
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/18261
dc.description.abstractPassive sampling provides a cost-effective alternative to conventional auto-sampling and serves as a valuable approach for wastewater surveillance in resource-limited settings. However, the feasibility of passive sampling for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater genomic surveillance (WWGS) remains underexplored in wastewater resource recovery facility (WWRF). In this study, we collected influent wastewater samples using an autosampler, COSCa-ball and Torpedo passive samplers from inlet of WWRF serving the city of Ottawa, Canada. We enriched, extracted, quantified, and sequenced samples targeting SARS-CoV-2 genome using a widely used ARTIC tiled amplicon approach. Our findings show that daily SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels were similar (p > 0.05) across the sampling methods. Although similar viral RNA was captured from passive samples, we found genomic recovery of SARS-CoV-2 from passive samplers was influenced by targeted sequencing read length, with shorter (300 bp) reads resulting in lower recovery than longer (600 bp) reads. Our study confirmed near-complete recovery of SARS-CoV-2 genomes (≥ 90 %) from the autosampler, COSCa-ball, and Torpedo samplers using longer reads. Genome sequencing parameters such as the number of raw reads, trimmed reads, mapped reads, depth of coverage and % of genome coverage was identical (p > 0.05) among the sampling methods. Genomic analyses showed similar (p > 0.05) single nucleotide variant profiles (SNV) and lineage prevalence across sampling methods, and concordance with the available clinical surveillance. Overall, the findings suggest that passive sampling of wastewater is a viable, cost-effective alternative for population-scale genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and may allow for surveillance of other pathogens, supporting future pandemic preparedness efforts.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWater Researches_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries;vol. 285
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425009790?via%3Dihubes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectwastewater surveillancees_ES
dc.subjectgenome sequencinges_ES
dc.subjectSingle Nucleotide Variantses_ES
dc.subjectlineage prevalencees_ES
dc.subjectCOSCa-ballTorpedoes_ES
dc.titlePassive sampling for genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater resource recovery facility: Insights for pandemic preparednesses_ES
dc.typearticlees_ES
reunir.tag~OPUes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124071


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem