Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBarrón Martínez, Julia Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorSalvador Cruz, Judith
dc.date2025
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-20T07:07:34Z
dc.date.available2025-06-20T07:07:34Z
dc.identifier.citationBarrón-Martínez, J. B. y Salvador-Cruz, J. (2025). Types of errors in Raven tests in a population with Down syndrome: An online assessment. Learning and Motivation, 91, Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102150es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1095-9122
dc.identifier.issn0023-9690
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/18084
dc.description1. The objective of this study was to identify the types of errors made on the Raven (divided into difference, figure repetition, inadequate individuation, and incomplete correlates. Although no statistically significant differences were found between the types of errors, the most common was figure repetition. 2. This is the first study in a Mexican population with Down syndrome that analyzes the types of errors made on the Raven test, in order to understand the types of perceptual information that present difficulty in processing. 3. The results from this and future studies could form the basis of educational intervention programs for people with Down syndrome, focused on enhancing the perceptual abilities represented by each of the four types of errors (for example, patterns, analogies, distortions, irrelevancies, or rotation of geometric or non-geometric elements) in order to achieve better cognitive performance in these areas.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to describe the types of visuoperceptual errors on Raven tests in a sample of Mexican people with Down syndrome (DS), and to explore whether these errors were related to mental age (MA) or chronological age (CA). Participants included 50 people with DS, with a mean CA of 19.47 years and a mean MA of 7.40 years. The Raven Colored Progressive Matrices test was used to obtain the MA and also to analyze four types of errors: 1) difference, 2) figure repetition, 3) inadequate individuation, and 4) incomplete correlates. The study was carried out online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants made an average of 22.84 errors on a total of 36 items. No predominance was found of any of the four types of errors. However, MA was negatively correlated with three error types. Because there are similar proportions of the four errors, the results do not allow us to define a specific perceptual deficit profile; errors on the test could be the result of general difficulties in the organization of perceptual information. Future studies could investigate whether this pattern of results is related to cognitive abilities such as working memory or executive functions.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherELSEVIERes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries;vol. 91
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969025000578es_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectDown Syndromees_ES
dc.subjectraven testses_ES
dc.subjectperceptual abilitieses_ES
dc.subjectonline assessmentes_ES
dc.titleTypes of errors in Raven tests in a population with Down syndrome: An online assessmentes_ES
dc.typearticlees_ES
reunir.tag~OPUes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102150


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem