Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorFriel, James
dc.contributor.authorBombarely, Aureliano
dc.contributor.authorDorca-Fornell, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorLuque, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Ocaña, Ana Maria
dc.date2021
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-31T10:09:45Z
dc.date.available2022-05-31T10:09:45Z
dc.identifier.issn2223-7747
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/13206
dc.description.abstractOlive, Olea europaea L., is a tree of great economic and cultural importance in the Mediterranean basin. Thousands of cultivars have been described, of which around 1200 are conserved in the different olive germplasm banks. The genetic characterisation of these cultivars can be performed in different ways. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides more information than the reduced representation methods such as genotype by sequencing (GBS), but at a much higher cost. This may change as the cost of sequencing continues to drop, but, currently, genotyping hundreds of cultivars using WGS is not a realistic goal for most research groups. Our aim is to systematically compare both methodologies applied to olive genotyping and summarise any possible recommendations for the geneticists and molecular breeders of the olive scientific community. In this work, we used a selection of 24 cultivars from an olive core collection from the World Olive Germplasm Collection of the Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (WOGBC), which represent the most of the cultivars present in cultivated fields over the world. Our results show that both methodologies deliver similar results in the context of phylogenetic analysis and popular population genetic analysis methods such as clustering. Furthermore, WGS and GBS datasets from different experiments can be merged in a single dataset to perform these analytical methodologies with proper filtering. We also tested the influence of the different olive reference genomes in this type of analysis, finding that they have almost no effect when estimating genetic relationships. This work represents the first comparative study between both sequencing techniques in olive. Our results demonstrate that the use of GBS is a perfectly viable option for replacing WGS and reducing research costs when the goal of the experiment is to characterise the genetic relationship between different accessions. Besides this, we show that it is possible to combine variants from GBS and WGS datasets, allowing the reuse of publicly available data.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries;vol. 10, nº 11
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/11/2514es_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectgenotype by sequencing (GBS)es_ES
dc.subjectolea europaea Les_ES
dc.subjectolivees_ES
dc.subjectreference genomees_ES
dc.subjectsingle-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)es_ES
dc.subjectwhole-genome sequencing (WGS)es_ES
dc.subjectScopuses_ES
dc.subjectJCRes_ES
dc.titleComparative analysis of genotyping by sequencing and whole-genome sequencing methods in diversity studies of olea europaea l.es_ES
dc.typearticlees_ES
reunir.tag~ARIes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112514


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem