Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGuaita Martínez, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Pardo, Mónica de
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Rodríguez, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorMartín Martín, José María
dc.date2019-09
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-17T08:42:24Z
dc.date.available2020-01-17T08:42:24Z
dc.identifier.issn2444-569X
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/9719
dc.description.abstractMCDM methods are useful to obtain information and generate knowledge useful for decision-making processes in multidisciplinary contexts. Particularly, when conflicts occur, knowledge is the key to start negotiation processes between stakeholders in order to achieve consensual solutions. The planning of protected areas is complex due to many competing uses of natural resources and the involvement of a large number of stakeholders. For the last ten years, participative MCDM methodologies have been carried out efficiently to reduce conflicts and allow to formalize stakeholder's participation in the policy development processes. In this paper, we propose a MCDM participative methodology in three levels that seeks to define management plans in protected areas. This method allows for the definition of management plans based on three levels of criteria that define the use of the natural area and provide a ranking of the main goals according to the stakeholders' priorities. The model was tested in two Spanish protected areas: Parque Natural de Lago de Sanabria y alrededores and Parque Natural de los Arribes del Duero. Firstly, the individual preferences of the most representative stakeholder groups were collected (Farmers, Business owners, Government and Scientists) and analyzed using two multi-criteria methods: AHP and GP. Moreover, a conflict index between stakeholders' groups was calculated. Results showed that conservation and development goals are the most preferred to consider for the planning of these areas. Furthermore, the most serious disagreement was found between farmers and scientists and between farmers and government about the wildlife conservation.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherDisability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technologyes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries;vol. 4, nº 4
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X19300071?via%3Dihubes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectprotected areases_ES
dc.subjectMCDMes_ES
dc.subjectAHPes_ES
dc.subjectGPes_ES
dc.subjectsustainable developmentes_ES
dc.subjectknowledge transferes_ES
dc.subjectEmerginges_ES
dc.subjectScopuses_ES
dc.titleInnovation and multi-level knowledge transfer using a multi-criteria decision making method for the planning of protected areases_ES
dc.typeArticulo Revista Indexadaes_ES
reunir.tag~ARIes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.01.001


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem