Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, P.
dc.contributor.authorDominguez, D.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Vázquez, R.
dc.contributor.authorLetelier, V.
dc.contributor.authorGencel, O.
dc.date2023
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-11T08:26:55Z
dc.date.available2024-04-11T08:26:55Z
dc.identifier.citationMunoz, P., Dominguez, D., Sanchez-Vazquez, R., Letelier, V., & Gencel, O. (2023). Building decarbonization by means of ancient techniques. Assessment of environmental impact, energy performance and mechanical safety. Journal of Building Engineering, 74, 106896.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2352-7102
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/16289
dc.description.abstractThe construction sector seeks for more environmentally friendly construction materials. Henceforth, materials such as earth-based materials (EBM) or straw bales (SB) are lately becoming more popular for architectural designs. Notwithstanding, their technical aptitudes are major concerns since few studies have assessed them from an integral perspective. Thus, this article aims to assess their performance by considering different approaches such as energy consumption, thermal comfort, mechanical response, and environmental impact. Results were compared to those provided by conventional materials such as fired bricks and concrete blocks. A typical detached house was modelled by following Chilean building codes. The energy assessment was determined by dynamic calculations while mechanical aptitude was assessed by means of push-over analysis. Finally, the environmental impact in a cradle-to-grave perspective was determined through the ReCiPe methodology. Results show that EBMs and SB significantly reduce the environmental impact when compared with traditional materials. Thus, for human health, resource depletion and ecosystem quality an average of 40, 30 and 20%, respectively, were obtained by choosing SB or EBM. Since all cases did accomplish thermal insulation requirements, no significant differences were found in energy consumption. However, the higher thermal capacity of EBMs and the higher thermal resistance of SB, certainly led to savings (approx. 5%). Finally, for a medium intensity earthquake, negligible damage may be expected, and immediate occupancy levels are showed from capacity curves. It is concluded that EBMs and SB significantly reduce the environmental impact of the building and lead to satisfactory results in terms of energy performance and mechanical aptitude.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherELSEVIERes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries;vol. 74
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352710223010756?via%3Dihubes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectdecarbonizationes_ES
dc.subjectbuildinges_ES
dc.subjectenvironmental impactes_ES
dc.subjectenergy performancees_ES
dc.subjectmechanical safetyes_ES
dc.subjectJCRes_ES
dc.subjectScopuses_ES
dc.titleBuilding decarbonization by means of ancient techniques. Assessment of environmental impact, energy performance and mechanical safetyes_ES
dc.typeArticulo Revista Indexadaes_ES
reunir.tag~ARIes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106896


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem