Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPetkari, Eleni
dc.contributor.authorPriebe, Stefan
dc.date2023
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T15:57:40Z
dc.date.available2023-10-24T15:57:40Z
dc.identifier.citationPetkari, E., Priebe, S. Subjective quality of life factorial structure across mental disorders: should we switch to assessing dimensions?. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 273, 953–961 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-022-01536-zes_ES
dc.identifier.issn0940-1334
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/15458
dc.description.abstractA two-factor structure of subjective quality of life (SQoL) was established for patients with schizophrenia with the dimensions being ‘Life and Health’ and ‘Living Environment’. This study investigated whether the same structure applies in patients with mood and anxiety disorders and, if so, whether the dimension scores differ between the three diagnostic groups. SQoL data of 1366 patients with mood and 419 patients with anxiety disorders obtained on the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) were retrieved from 3 multisite studies. We performed Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFAs) based on the MANSA SQoL items of each diagnostic sample. Next, through a series of Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests, we compared the scores of the two factors across patients with mood disorders, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia. The two CFAs showed adequate fit of the two-factor structure across mood and anxiety disorders. The dimension scores on ‘Life and Health’ differed significantly between all three diagnostic groups. They were lowest in patients with anxiety disorders, higher in patients with mood disorders and highest in patients with schizophrenia. However, on the ‘Living Environment’ dimension, patients with mood disorders had significantly higher scores than patients with schizophrenia, whilst patients with anxiety disorders did not differ significantly from either other group. The findings suggest that a two-factor structure of SQoL applies across mental disorders. The two dimensions vary across diagnostic groups in different ways. Assessing two dimensions of SQoL may provide more specific and relevant information than global scores.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEuropean Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciencees_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries;vol. 273, nº 4
dc.relation.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00406-022-01536-zes_ES
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectanxietyes_ES
dc.subjectCFAes_ES
dc.subjectMANSAes_ES
dc.subjectmoodes_ES
dc.subjectsubjective quality of lifees_ES
dc.subjectJCRes_ES
dc.subjectScopuses_ES
dc.titleSubjective quality of life factorial structure across mental disorders: should we switch to assessing dimensions?es_ES
dc.typeArticulo Revista Indexadaes_ES
reunir.tag~ARIes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-022-01536-z


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem