Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorTorres-Quesada, M.
dc.contributor.authorLeiva, A.
dc.contributor.authorLupiáñez, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorHumphreys, G.
dc.contributor.authorFunes, M. J.
dc.date2022-07
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-15T14:09:11Z
dc.date.available2023-02-15T14:09:11Z
dc.identifier.citationTorres-Quesada, M., Leiva, A., Lupiáñez, J., Humphreys, G., & Funes, M. J. (2022). A process-specific approach in the study of normal aging deficits in cognitive control: What deteriorates with age?. Acta Psychologica, 227, 103625.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0001-6918
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/14184
dc.description.abstractBearing in mind that cognitive control is a complex function that includes several processes, it is not clear exactly which ones deteriorate with age. In fact, controversial results have been found. For example, some studies indicate that age-related deficits are observed in proactive and not in reactive control, others show that it is reactive control that is impaired and not proactive control, and some studies find no deficits at all (e.g., Kopp, Lange, Howe, & Wessel, 2014; Xiang et al., 2016). One possible reason is that the contribution of different processes to the deterioration of cognitive control was investigated separately, i.e., without testing all processes within the same paradigm. Therefore, the main goal of the present experiment was to study the impact of normal aging on several processes related to cognitive control within the same task, which included both Simon and Spatial Stroop trials. The study focused on the following processes: generation of conflict measured by automatic response capture (i.e., stronger task-irrelevant information processing compared to task-relevant information processing); conflict detection; and control implementation (which can be reactive control, both within trials and across trials, and proactive control, as a task-set strategy). The results showed larger automatic response capture for older adults when facing a stimulus-response conflict (Simon) but not a stimulus-stimulus conflict (Spatial Stroop). Similarly, older adults also showed larger detection effects for both conflicts. However, regarding control implementation, they only showed difficulties in inhibiting the early automatic response capture (within-trial reactive control) but not reactive control across trials or proactive control. In conclusion, it seems that older adults are more affected by the presence of task-irrelevant information, especially when it comes to resolving stimulus-response conflict. However, they showed no impairments in their ability to implement cognitive control both across trials and as a task-set strategy.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherActa Psychologicaes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries;vol. 227
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691822001408?via%3Dihubes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectcognitive controles_ES
dc.subjectreactive controles_ES
dc.subjectproactive controles_ES
dc.subjectaginges_ES
dc.subjectJCRes_ES
dc.subjectScopuses_ES
dc.titleA process-specific approach in the study of normal aging deficits in cognitive control: What deteriorates with age?es_ES
dc.typeArticulo Revista Indexadaes_ES
reunir.tag~ARIes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103625


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem