Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMallorqui-Bague, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorMestre-Bach, Gemma (1)
dc.contributor.authorLozano-Madrid, María
dc.contributor.authorGranero, Roser
dc.contributor.authorVintró-Alcaraz, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Aranda, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Peña, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorMoragas, Laura
dc.contributor.authorPino-Gutiérrez, Amparo del
dc.contributor.authorMenchón, José M.
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Murcia, Susana
dc.date2021-02
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-06T07:28:14Z
dc.date.available2021-05-06T07:28:14Z
dc.identifier.issn1873-6327
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/11286
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims: It has been suggested that compulsivity has an essential role in gambling disorder (GD), yet there is a lack of literature exploring the link between GD, compulsivity and gender. Our main aim was to explore gender differences between two of the neurocognitive domains of compulsivity (attentional set-shifting and attentional bias and disengagement) in patients with GD and compare them with healthy controls (HCs). Methods: The sample included 57 treatment-seeking adults with GD and 60 HCs recruited from the general population. Results: The pairwise comparisons showed a worse attentional set-shifting performance in women with GD than in men (total trials (p = 0.042, vertical bar d vertical bar = 0.56), perseverative responses (p = 0.001, vertical bar d vertical bar = 0.89), trails to complete the first category (p = 0.001, vertical bar d vertical bar = 0.78) and categories completed (p = 0.001, vertical bar d vertical bar = 0.98. Also, men with GD presented higher difficulties than HC men in the two assessed compulsivity domains (attentional bias and disengagement and attentional set-shifting; Stroop interference (p = 0.015, vertical bar d vertical bar = 0.11), TMT-B (p = 0.041, vertical bar d vertical bar = 1.96) and lower scores for the WCST perseverative responses (p = 0.007, vertical bar d vertical bar = 0.78), whereas the differences observed in women with GD and HCs were most significantly in attentional set-shifting. Conclusions: This study provides the first evidence of gender compulsivity differences in GD. The results are relevant for improving current treatments by targeting specific compulsivity domains that can lead to more successful treatment options.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAddictive Behaviorses_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries;vol. 113
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306460320308133?via%3Dihubes_ES
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectgambling disorderes_ES
dc.subjectgenderes_ES
dc.subjectcompulsivityes_ES
dc.subjectattentional set-shiftinges_ES
dc.subjectattentional bias/disengagementes_ES
dc.subjectneurocognitiones_ES
dc.subjectJCRes_ES
dc.subjectScopuses_ES
dc.titleGender and gambling disorder: Differences in compulsivity-related neurocognitive domainses_ES
dc.typeArticulo Revista Indexadaes_ES
reunir.tag~ARIes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106683


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem