Automatic insect identification, counting, and monitoring techniques: a review
| dc.contributor.author | González García, Mariano | |
| dc.contributor.author | Noguera Polania, Juan Carlos | |
| dc.contributor.author | González Combarros, Rosana | |
| dc.contributor.author | López Sánchez, José Ignacio | |
| dc.date | 2026 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-19T10:09:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND Insect pests threaten agricultural productivity, while conventional surveillance is labour-intensive and excessive pesticide use creates environmental and health risks. This review evaluated automated insect detection, counting, classification and monitoring technologies, focusing on machine-learning integration, field transferability, and operational readiness. RESULTS A PRISMA 2020-guided formal search covering publications from 2010 to 2024 identified 313 records relevant to the technological and methodological scope of the review. After title/abstract screening and full-text eligibility assessment, 116 publications were retained. The evidence encompassed camera- and vision-based systems; acoustic, infrared, and optoelectronic sensors; electrostatic and physical approaches; non-lethal photonic monitoring; radar and biosensing technologies; Internet of Things-enabled platforms; and machine- and deep-learning methods. Camera- and vision-based systems were among the most extensively documented and field-oriented approaches, particularly when integrated with remote image acquisition, communication networks, and automated classification. Acoustic systems provided complementary options for continuous or low-power monitoring, whereas radar, biosensing, and other emerging approaches broadened applications toward biodiversity assessment, large-area surveillance, and early detection. Reported performance was not directly comparable across publications because metrics, acquisition conditions, and validation levels differed substantially, ranging from laboratory or dataset benchmarks to semi-field trials, field validations, and operational deployments. CONCLUSION No single technology is optimal for all monitoring objectives. Operational adoption requires standardized task-specific reporting, independent and sustained field validation, representative datasets, improved transferability across crops and environments, and system-level assessment of robustness, energy autonomy, connectivity, maintenance, and cost. Sensor fusion, edge artificial intelligence, and domain-adaptive or uncertainty-aware models are promising when they provide measurable decision-support benefits. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | González García, M., Polania, J.C.N., Combarros, R.G. and Sánchez, J.I.L. (2026), Automatic insect identification, counting, and monitoring techniques: a review. Pest Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.71365 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://doi.org/10.1002/ps.71365 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1526-4998 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1526-498X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/23584 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Pest Management Science | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.71365 | |
| dc.rights | openAccess | |
| dc.rights.license | CC BY-NC-ND | |
| dc.subject | agriculture | |
| dc.subject | AI | |
| dc.subject | insect | |
| dc.subject | monitoring | |
| dc.subject | pest | |
| dc.subject | sustainable | |
| dc.subject.ocde | 4.00.00 - Ciencias agrícolas::4.01.00 - Agricultura, Silvicultura, Pesquería | |
| dc.title | Automatic insect identification, counting, and monitoring techniques: a review | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| reunir.tag | ~OPU |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- Pest Management Science - 2026 - González García - Automatic insect identification counting and monitoring techniques a.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 1.97 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
Bloque de licencias
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 1.65 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción:


