Automatic insect identification, counting, and monitoring techniques: a review

dc.contributor.authorGonzález García, Mariano
dc.contributor.authorNoguera Polania, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Combarros, Rosana
dc.contributor.authorLópez Sánchez, José Ignacio
dc.date2026
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-19T10:09:34Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Insect pests threaten agricultural productivity, while conventional surveillance is labour-intensive and excessive pesticide use creates environmental and health risks. This review evaluated automated insect detection, counting, classification and monitoring technologies, focusing on machine-learning integration, field transferability, and operational readiness. RESULTS A PRISMA 2020-guided formal search covering publications from 2010 to 2024 identified 313 records relevant to the technological and methodological scope of the review. After title/abstract screening and full-text eligibility assessment, 116 publications were retained. The evidence encompassed camera- and vision-based systems; acoustic, infrared, and optoelectronic sensors; electrostatic and physical approaches; non-lethal photonic monitoring; radar and biosensing technologies; Internet of Things-enabled platforms; and machine- and deep-learning methods. Camera- and vision-based systems were among the most extensively documented and field-oriented approaches, particularly when integrated with remote image acquisition, communication networks, and automated classification. Acoustic systems provided complementary options for continuous or low-power monitoring, whereas radar, biosensing, and other emerging approaches broadened applications toward biodiversity assessment, large-area surveillance, and early detection. Reported performance was not directly comparable across publications because metrics, acquisition conditions, and validation levels differed substantially, ranging from laboratory or dataset benchmarks to semi-field trials, field validations, and operational deployments. CONCLUSION No single technology is optimal for all monitoring objectives. Operational adoption requires standardized task-specific reporting, independent and sustained field validation, representative datasets, improved transferability across crops and environments, and system-level assessment of robustness, energy autonomy, connectivity, maintenance, and cost. Sensor fusion, edge artificial intelligence, and domain-adaptive or uncertainty-aware models are promising when they provide measurable decision-support benefits. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
dc.identifier.citationGonzález García, M., Polania, J.C.N., Combarros, R.G. and Sánchez, J.I.L. (2026), Automatic insect identification, counting, and monitoring techniques: a review. Pest Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.71365
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.1002/ps.71365
dc.identifier.issn1526-4998
dc.identifier.issn1526-498X
dc.identifier.urihttps://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/23584
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPest Management Science
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.71365
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND
dc.subjectagriculture
dc.subjectAI
dc.subjectinsect
dc.subjectmonitoring
dc.subjectpest
dc.subjectsustainable
dc.subject.ocde4.00.00 - Ciencias agrícolas::4.01.00 - Agricultura, Silvicultura, Pesquería
dc.titleAutomatic insect identification, counting, and monitoring techniques: a review
dc.typearticle
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
reunir.tag~OPU

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Nombre:
Pest Management Science - 2026 - González García - Automatic insect identification counting and monitoring techniques a.pdf
Tamaño:
1.97 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.65 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: